its not really logical to have fur on his SKIN areas. its clearly not natural for any fur to be on what is meant to be his skin... but u can draw it the way u want, im just stating fact, but u dont have to draw with fact, im not trying to really disrespect your art, but i was just letting ya know.
That doesn't even make sense. Why should Sonic be half-naked of all characters? Like i said, just because his belly and arms have skin-colors does't make them his skin. Silver and Shadow also have fur on that places, just in different colors.
So, then show me official statements of Sega, that it's his skin. If you're telling me, it's fact, there shouldn't be any problems to show me.
im not trying to make a problem im just sharking what i believe... but the logic most of us believe is that in the games there is no fur at all, but with shadow and silver there is fur texture and looks. im just saying. im not like "oh hes naked" like u think im saying. anyways im done, i have to pack up for my trip to a rustic cabin with my parents...
See. You just said, what you believe. And besides, you can't tell, what most of the people around believe, because you don't know all of the people and their opinions. I'm just trying to say, that you shouldn't comment others work, only to force them to draw, what you believe it has to be.